SupaSailing vs Floatist: Integrated Platform vs Focused Tool Compared

Choosing between SupaSailing and Floatist usually comes down to one question: do you want Floatist’s focused approach, or an integrated platform where charter is one of several connected modules? This is a factual look at where each fits.

At a glance

Where Floatist fits

Floatist focuses on the operational side of bareboat charter: digital check-in and check-out, boat management, damage reporting and guest workflows, delivered through a clean mobile experience. For an operator whose main pain is boat turnarounds and handovers, that focus is a real strength.

Where SupaSailing fits

SupaSailing takes a different approach: charter is one of six integrated modules — yacht & fleet management, charter, brokerage & sales CRM, refit / shipyard and marina — all on a single shared data model. A vessel or customer created once is available everywhere, with no duplicate entry between disconnected tools. It suits operators who want charter connected to the rest of the business rather than run as an island. As a newer platform it is modern and mobile-first; teams that only ever need one narrow function may not use every module.

How to choose

• Single function vs. whole business. If Floatist’s specialty is genuinely all you need, it is a focused, capable choice. If that work touches your fleet, maintenance, brokerage or accounting, an integrated platform removes duplicate data entry.
• Data model. Ask whether vessels and customers live once or are re-keyed between tools — that difference compounds over time.
• Migration & ownership. Confirm you can export your data and move at your own pace.

If you would rather have charter in the same system as fleet, maintenance, brokerage, refit and marina, book a SupaSailing demo to compare it directly against your current setup.